Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-7689855-20150223020114/@comment-3531063-20150224045009

Kaeghan-is-a-Tribute wrote: If anything, a new Bureaucrat should be assigned from the previous lot of admins, and maybe one or two new admins should be appointed as well. And when appointing new admins, I think we should mainly look upon time span on the wiki as opposed to edits because somebody could be here for almost two years and only make 1'000 edits like me (not trying to toot my own horn), which these 1'000 edits aren't small useless ones. While someone else could possibly be here for 6 months and make 2'000 small/useless ones. Just my opinion, but I think it's worth taking into consideration because it may give an extra step of professionalism and seasoning (as in experience on the wiki). Well, if we go by that logic, I'm the most qualified person to be admin by far. Sure, I may only have 1000 or so edits in the (soon to be) 4 years I've been on this wiki, but...eh.

While time span and edits can be important, it's hard to judge how qualified a person is by these numerical numbers because, really, there are plenty of factors that could effect things like that.

Just some food for thought.