Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5900632-20140629014555/@comment-24692847-20140707062813

I actually think I saw a page that had "Runner-Up" on it when I was adding categories. I, myself, don't really think it's a necessary category, unlike some like tributes.

Now, before I get yelled at, the only reason I say this is because once we get a Runner-Up, then someone will try 2nd Runner-Up, then 3rd Runner-Up and before you know it, there's a category for a tribute who died in the bloodbath.

However, before I get too far ahead, let me just bring up a few questions I had about this:

(a.) How would we know if someone was a Runner-Up? Very few people post links of Hunger Games the tribute participated in, so the liability will be weak (at least without the link).

(b.) How many tribute pages will have this category? This may sound like a stupid question, since every time someone is crowned victor, someone becomes Runner-Up, but, as I stated before not all pages have links to Hunger Games, this category will only be used by the handful of people who saw this discussion.

(c.) Why would you want to add the 2nd Runner-Up category? I truly think that it may be a little hard to promote the idea of just the Runner-Up, but I'm not really sure.

Now, although I said I don't think it's a necessary category, I stand neutral of the idea. I don't think it's a bad idea, except for the 2nd Runner-Up if someone adds that, but I don't want only ten people adding this category to their tribute's pages. I'll think about it.