Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5082922-20131103042759

Okay so, after the first public TOTM I wish to ask you guys some questions about it, about the features of it to see what we can improve. After all, this is the first time TOTM has been public, ever, so it's not expect to be perfect.

First off, I need to adress the fact that the judging day was a little too late. It's my fault completely, not the system of voting. I wanted other's opinions so badly which is why I waited judging, not trusting my own judgement skills. I believe that I need to trust my own instincts more, rather than asking for other's. If you wish, you can add that as a point to your answers of the questions below, though, now you at least why it was delayed.

With that being said, here we go:

General Questions
1. What was your general opinion of the whole thing?

2. Did you believe any parts of it had too much bias? Which?

3. Do you believe there should be more than one judge?

4 Do you believe the number of nomminations in round 1 was good? If not, which humber would you prefer?

5 Do you believe that the "top 3 voting" system in round 2 was good? If not, how could we improve it?

6 Do you believe people should be allowed to nomminate their own tributes still?

'''7 Do you believe TOTM should stay public? '''

Rule Proposals
Here's some new rules which I propose for next round. You can just answer yes/no to these.

1. "A tribute who was a part of the final 5 in the last TOTM can not be nomminated right after. They have to wait a month before getting renomminated."

Thank you for taking your time to answer these. If you have anything else you wish to add, please do so. 