Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5082922-20131103042759/@comment-5810244-20131103141232

Well, Anna, I honestly think that you have been doing a really good job at being unbiased, however, I think that another judge wouldn't hurt. If your stuck on a close call, like you said there was, then maybe get an outside source who might have never seen the tribute before. But, I'd only say to use another judge IF you are struggling to make a close call between two or more tributes.

Forget what I said about #5 and #6. How about if we just do what we did this time. I think that it should go:

1. Nominations are made. You can nominate 3 or 4 tributes (depending on what you want) and we should be able to give at least one of our own tribues.

2. Admin/Judge reviews each tribute and, out of the chosen, makes a list of the top ten.

3. Out of the Top 10, users should get a week to vote before the list of the Top 5 come in.

4. In the Top 5, other users CAN vote on their  favorite tribute. However, the judge/admin has the overall call.


 * Basically the same as we did last time, except for when the tributes make it to the top 5. That's were I think we should vote on one tribute, but if the judge is leaning towards someone else, they can just go with who they want.

And the rule thing, I did see that it was next month. However. . . you know what, just change my vote. I had a reason just a little while ago, but now I forgot it :P